Inclusive Education, Digital Divides, and Learning Outcomes among Marginalized Secondary Students in Pakistan: Access, Engagement, and Equity Gaps in Hybrid Learning Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65761/jssp.2026.111Keywords:
Digital divide educational equity, hybrid learning engagement, inclusive secondary education, educational technology Pakistan, digital access academic outcomes, learning inclusion strategies, post-pandemic educational disparityAbstract
Background: Hybrid learning has expanded educational opportunities but has also exposed digital inequalities that limit equitable participation. In Pakistan, disparities in internet access, device ownership, and digital skills may hinder learning among marginalized secondary school students.
Objective: To examine the relationship between digital access, learning engagement, inclusion, and academic outcomes among marginalized secondary school students in Pakistan, while exploring teachers' and parents' perspectives on educational equity.
Methods: A mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted among 648 students, 98 teachers, and 84 parents from public, private, and low-fee private schools across rural, peri-urban, and urban Pakistan. Participants were recruited through stratified convenience sampling. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and focus group discussions. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, ANOVA, hierarchical regression, and structural equation modeling, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.
Results: Significant socioeconomic and geographic disparities in digital access were identified. Overall, 17.9% of students lacked digital devices and 65.0% reported limited internet connectivity. Private-school students demonstrated significantly greater learning engagement than public and low-fee private school students (p<0.001). Learning engagement (β=0.36), device access (β=0.31), internet quality (β=0.28), parental education (β=0.17), and teacher digital training (β=0.14) significantly predicted academic outcomes (p<0.001). Digital access also improved educational inclusion and engagement, leading to better academic performance.
Conclusion: Digital inequality remains a major barrier to inclusive education in Pakistan. Expanding digital infrastructure, affordable internet access, and teacher digital capacity is essential to improve educational equity and learning outcomes.
References
Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
Alenezi, M., Wardat, S., & Akour, M. (2023). The need of integrating digital education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 15(6), 4782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064782
Anthony Jnr, B., & Noel, S. (2021). Examining the adoption of emergency remote teaching and virtual learning during and after COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(6), 1136–1150. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2020-0370
Arkorful, V. E., Basiru, I., Anokye, R., Latif, A., Agyei, E. K., Hammond, A., et al. (2020). Equitable access and inclusiveness in basic education: Roadblocks to sustainable development goals. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1627554
Ben Youssef, A., Dahmani, M., & Ragni, L. (2022). ICT use, digital skills and students’ academic performance: Exploring the digital divide. Information, 13(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129
Buhl-Wiggers, J., Kjærgaard, A., & Munk, K. (2023). A scoping review of experimental evidence on face-to-face components of blended learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2123911
Cerf, M. E. (2023). The social-education-economy-health nexus, development and sustainability: Perspectives from low-and middle-income and African countries. Discover Sustainability, 4(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-023-00153-7
Chankseliani, M., & McCowan, T. (2021). Higher education and the sustainable development goals. Higher Education, 81(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00652-w
Chankseliani, M., Qoraboyev, I., & Gimranova, D. (2021). Higher education contributing to local, national, and global development: New empirical and conceptual insights. Higher Education, 81(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00565-8
de Souza Rodrigues, M. A., Chimenti, P., & Nogueira, A. R. R. (2021). An exploration of eLearning adoption in the educational ecosystem. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 585–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10276-3
Edeji, O. C. (2024). Neo-liberalism, human capital theory and the right to education: Economic interpretation of the purpose of education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100734
Feraco, T., Resnati, D., Fregonese, D., Spoto, A., & Meneghetti, C. (2023). An integrated model of school students’ academic achievement and life satisfaction: Linking soft skills, extracurricular activities, self-regulated learning, motivation, and emotions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00601-4
Francisco, M. P. B., Hartman, M., & Wang, Y. (2020). Inclusion and special education. Education Sciences, 10(9), 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090238
Golden, A. R., Srisarajivakul, E. N., Hasselle, A. J., Pfund, R. A., & Knox, J. (2023). What was a gap is now a chasm: Remote schooling, the digital divide, and educational inequities resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Opinion in Psychology, 52, 101632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101632
Halai, A., & Durrani, N. (2021). School education system in Pakistan: Expansion, access, and equity. In Handbook of education systems in South Asia (pp. 665–693). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0032-9_17
Jamil, S., & Muschert, G. (2024). The COVID-19 pandemic and e-learning: The digital divide and educational crises in Pakistan’s universities. American Behavioral Scientist, 68(9), 1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231156779
Korpershoek, H., Canrinus, E. T., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & De Boer, H. (2020). The relationships between school belonging and students’ motivational, social-emotional, behavioural, and academic outcomes in secondary education: A meta-analytic review. Research Papers in Education, 35(6), 641–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1615116
Krishnaswami, M., Iyer, L. S., John, C., & Devanathan, M. (2022). Countering educational disruptions through an inclusive approach: Bridging the digital divide in distance education. In Socioeconomic inclusion during an era of online education (pp. 204–224). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4364-4.ch010
Langthaler, M., & Bazafkan, H. (2020). Digitalization, education and skills development in the Global South: An assessment of the debate with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa (ÖFSE Briefing Paper No. 28). https://doi.org/10.60637/2020-bp28
Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A. N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
Mishra, A., Mishra, A., & Pandey, G. (2023). Spatial inequality and education: Unraveling the geographical dimensions of educational disparities. TechnoLearn: International Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.30954/2231-4105.01.2023.6
Olanrewaju, G. S., Adebayo, S. B., Omotosho, A. Y., & Olajide, C. F. (2021). Left behind? The effects of digital gaps on e-learning in rural secondary schools and remote communities across Nigeria during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100092
Pregowska, A., Masztalerz, K., Garlińska, M., & Osial, M. (2021). A worldwide journey through distance education—from the post office to virtual, augmented and mixed realities, and education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(3), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030118
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
Singh, H. P., Singh, A., Alam, F., & Agrawal, V. (2022). Impact of sustainable development goals on economic growth in Saudi Arabia: Role of education and training. Sustainability, 14(21), 14119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114119
Tonegawa, Y. (2022). Education in SDGs: What is inclusive and equitable quality education? In Sustainable development disciplines for humanity: Breaking down the 5Ps—people, planet, prosperity, peace, and partnerships (pp. 55–70). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4859-6_4
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Transitioning to e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have higher education institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6401–6419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w
Tyagi, R., Vishwakarma, S., Rishi, M., & Rajiah, S. (2021). Reducing inequalities through education and skill development courses. In Reduced inequalities (pp. 746–758). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95882-8_102
Van De Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100
Winter, S. (2021). Inclusive and exclusive education for diverse learning needs. In Quality education (pp. 451–463). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95870-5_24
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Social Science Perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
